Social stratification is the division of people into groups where there are large differences between wealth, power, and prestige. Class, gender, age, and ethnicity also play a role in social division. The way I see it, these divisions cause inequality because if there was no division, then we would all be equal but sadly there is a division. People of the upper class are the wealthy people who we see driving the most expensive cars, wearing the most expensive clothes, and living in the biggest house by the beach or own their own private property. People of the middle class are not as wealthy as the upper class but they are people who have a job, a decent house in a good neighborhood, a nice car, and have just enough money to survive. For the lower class people, they don't have as much as the middle class. They are probably the ones to live in a bad neighborhood and who may have difficulty getting a job that pays a decent amount of money because they probably didn't have the privilege of getting an education so that they can get a decent job and not live in poverty. This is where inequality takes place. Majority of the upper class ignore people or things that are below them. “For decades, surveys have shown that upper-income Americans don’t give away as much of their money as they might and are particularly undistinguished as givers when compared with the poor, who are strikingly generous. A number of other studies have shown that lower-income Americans give proportionally more of their incomes to charity than do upper-income Americans”- New York Times
(http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/22/magazine/22FOB-wwln-t.html). I really don't understand why majority of the upper class refuse to use their money for a good cause like donating to charity. Instead they spend it on nice and expensive things. No, I'm not saying that they should give all their money away to the poor but at least give them a little of what you have. Maybe then some of them can gain respect. It’s sad how people who barely have a thing give away more money than the people who have more than they can manage.
When you have wealth and power, don't abuse it because it can all go away as fast as a lightning strike. If you were rude and obnoxious when you have power it isn't good because when you lose your power, you can lose your wealth and when you lose your wealth you still won't have prestige. Whereas if you were nice and didn't abuse your power, when push comes to shove at least you will still have the respect and honor for being a good person. All I am saying is that it is not good to ignore and treat people differently based on their class and how wealthy and powerful they are. At the end of the day, we are all humans and we all need a hand to make it through life without the ignorance of people who think they are better than everyone else just because they have better advantages.
I like your point of view of this topic. I agree that we are all humans and we need to help each other, BUT giving away money isn't the answer. I believe in this quote: “Give a man a fish; you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish; and you have fed him for a lifetime”. Although I have not been doing so...
ReplyDeleteI like how you defined Stratification for everyone and talked about when you have power and wealth you shouldn't abuse it. Great Job
ReplyDeleteWow, that is so selfish of the upper class to not give some of their wealth to charity. Considering that some people in the lower class have done it, it is just sad that the high class won't even help others. Very nice NY times quote. And AWWWWW, the picture is sad but true.
ReplyDeleteI think the wealthy people who have well above their needs financially should be required to support a charity. It is sad that they keep their money to themselves. Great blog!
ReplyDeleteBeing equal will never be achieved for now. And thaws rich people have so much money & refused to use itnfor good will ( some not all). And oh my goodness I just saw your picture , so sad! But great blog!
ReplyDeleteI love the political cartoons haha, they really help drive the message across. I mean, what can you expect though, those who are born into money have no value of it, I'm not condoning it, but it makes some sense as to why they don't give to charity. Sad, isn't it?
ReplyDeleteI imagined the pain experienced by the little guy in the last cartoon. I do agree that the rich should be more charitable to the poor. I was quite shocked about the small difference between the donation of the rich and the other classes. Maybe it because of the bad economy. You know the rich never want to be poor, so they probably just manage their money.
ReplyDeletei'm commenting bc I can, not because you need it. You're right though. Everyone wants to be rich. No one wants to be poor. I really am different because I just want to be comfortable and wonderful. I'm too extreme for extremes.
ReplyDeleteI'm on the same boat as Gabby here.
ReplyDeleteI don't care for a Gates fortune, just enough to buy an island and an army of hamsters to control the world with ^_^
Also, nice layout. It got a little hard to read and hurt my eyes a tad, but the physical anguish was made up for with the nice content!
ReplyDeleteGreat job, Chivante!
ReplyDelete